Collectors in China are buying back traditional
pieces, such as a reported $83 million paid for a Chinese vase, and investing
in contemporary artworks by Chinese artists (see Misdirection of "Cultural
Security"). The contemporary art market in India burgeons and reports of
smuggling through the Sunderbans suggests an active illicit market in
artifacts. In the Middle East, the translation of Sarah Thornton's "Seven
Days in the Art World" into Arabic indicates an interest in learning
about, if not adopting, western wiles of the art trade.
So, the West is demonstrating a sincerity and
earnestness in cultural security from a traditional point of view i.e.
returning cultural property to regions of origin and deterring trafficking in
art, antiquities, and artifacts, while the East seems to be seeking innovation
in cultural security by buying back cultural patrimony, actively exploiting the
economic potential of contemporary art, and all the while showing willingness
to appreciate western market know-how.
As much as it's right to commend western
efforts, is it not difficult not to admire eastern initiative?
Learn about the framework for Cultural Intelligence.
















