Wanton
destruction in Mali and Syria provide poignant, topical examples. As with resolution of cases for repatriation, threats to the security
of cultural heritage in conflict would benefit from innovative policy that goes beyond sheer protection with strategic consideration of cultural heritage. The assertion of the interrelation of cultural heritage and international security suggests that artworks and
monuments have strategic value. The value, in turn, creates opportunity to
incorporate cultural heritage into policy in the interest of human security.
As
a first step, nations have realized the practical significance of cultural heritage to national security. The emerging relationship
between cultural property and human rights suggests the relevance of cultural
heritage to human security. Turkey recently brought human rights law into a case for repatriation of antiquities from the British Museum, and political tension on the twenty-year anniversary of the destruction of the Babri Mashid
in India illustrates the significance of cultural property in freedom of
expression. Targeting of shrines in Timbuktu and burning of the souk in Aleppo
undermine cultural identity and, thereby, compromise human security. In such
cases, cultural and human security intertwine.
Learn about the framework for Cultural Intelligence.
No comments:
Post a Comment