Over the past
half-century, UNESCO conventions have developed the political importance of
cultural property. In response, state parties to the conventions pursue
bilateral agreements and domestic policy in the interest of cultural security.
Specifically, countering the traffic in antiquities and preserving historic
monuments protects cultural identity, which plays a role in political stability.
Foreign policy that
supports the repatriation of cultural patrimony develops relations with the
“source nations” and demonstrates an interest in countering trafficking in
cultural material. Recent efforts by the US Department of Homeland Security in returning objects to Peru provides an example. Policy that supports the preservation of sites of cultural heritage positively reinforces relations with nations in
political turmoil. As one example, the US Ambassadors Fund supports restoration and conservation of cultural heritage
worldwide.
The perceived value of cultural
heritage also creates security risks. Terrorist groups target religious monuments in acts of political violence, an illicit trade in antiquities
induces looting in emerging nations, and an international art market creates opportunity for money laundering. Poignant examples
include the Taliban’s destruction of statues of Buddha, looting of antiquities
in Iraq, and a thriving market for forgeries of works by master artists worldwide.
Foreign policy that protects
monuments, counters trafficking in antiquities, and brings greater transparency
to the art market not only supports national security but also protects cultural
heritage of emerging nations.
Learn about the framework for Cultural Intelligence.
No comments:
Post a Comment