Both the Taliban and
Ansar Dine claimed religious grounds for the destruction, both intended to gain
publicity, and both garnered international response, but the degree of each
aspect differs in each case. Since the
demolition of the Bamiyan Buddhas, Iraq suffered wartime looting and collateral
damage of cultural sites in 2003 and nations from Turkey, to Italy, to Peru
continue to demonstrate the viability of cases for repatriation of cultural
patrimony. Consequently, targeting of
cultural property appears to have greater effect in that the destruction in
Timbuktu not only echoes but also amplifies the tactics of the Taliban.
In both cases, the
militants claimed to be destroying idolatrous symbols. In the case of Taliban,
the statues represented a different religion, while Ansar Dine justifies
destruction by associating targeted shrines with a local Sufi version of Islam,
which doesnot adhere to a strict version of Islamic law. In both cases, the acts of the
militants drew international calls to stop the wanton destruction of cultural heritage.
In 2001, nations worldwide, including Muslim nations, and UNESCO did speakout and offered humanitarian aid to halt the destruction, while now UNESCO has
placed Timbuktu on the list of endangered heritage sites and the InternationalCriminal Court has threatened to treat the acts of Ansar Dine as war crimes.
A shift to targeting
symbols within a particular religion and a shift to criminal prosecution in response
to destruction both suggest an increasing significance of cultural security to
international affairs.
Learn about the framework for Cultural Intelligence.
No comments:
Post a Comment